The successive visits of French President Hollande and UK Prime
Minister Cameron to India this month can be viewed from different
angles. Both countries clearly attach increasing importance to the India
relationship. Opportunities in India are considerable even now despite
the current economic slowdown, and will grow vastly as India continues
to rise. Interest in India is also part of the wider reality of economic
power shifting steadily towards Asia, with France and the UK,
therefore, needing to retain and expand their share of a market that is
fostering linkages eastwards. UK’s share of the Indian market has
dropped to 2 1/2 % from 10% at one time because they have admittedly not
been pro-active enough. The fact that Europe is in crisis and the
French and British economies are in trouble explains also the enhanced
attention to India.
For India too, relations with France and the UK are of major
importance bilaterally and within the framework of our relations with
Europe, which remains India’s largest trade and investment partner. The
Eurozone crisis has impacted more on the Indian economy than the US
financial crisis. France and the UK as the fifth and sixth largest
economies in the world with advanced technologies to offer are very
valuable partners for India. We are appealing to both to ensure a “fair,
balanced and forward looking” India-EU Trade and Investment FTA.
Both leaders were accompanied by large business delegations, 45 with
Hollande and over 100 with Cameron- the largest delegation to leave
UK’s shores. The target of doubling bilateral trade with France set up
in 2008 (Euros 12 billion by 2012) has not been met. That set up with
Britain in 2010 (Pounds 24 billion by 2015) is not likely to be met
either given present conditions.
On the investment side, the UK is well ahead of France, with Cameron
pointing out that 50% of Indian investment in Europe was in the UK and
the latter was the biggest European investor in India. He promised to
remove barriers to Indian investment in the UK further, asking in return
that India remove its barriers too, especially for British legal,
accountancy, architecture and other services.
India wants investment for upgrading its infrastructure. Hollande
laid stress on cooperation in sustainable urban planning, including
infrastructure, transport, water, waste management as well as railways.
The UK has shown interest in the Bangalore-Mumbai industrial corridor,
but the joint statement on this is couched in very tentative language,
with the leaders agreeing “to examine and evolve the modalities and
content of a feasibility study of this project concept through mutual
discussions and to work out a roadmap for a possible partnership in this
area”. British participation in India’s National Manufacturing and
Investment Zones has been mooted. This, it is felt, would attract
British SMEs to India. A lot of focus during Cameron’s visit was
actually on potential opportunities for them.
Cameron singled out health care and education as highly promising
areas. In education, the especially strong India-UK relations have been
impacted by changes in the UK visa regime. However, Cameron has
indicated these will be reversed- there will be no limit on visas and
graduate jobs, he said. He has promised the same day visa service to
Indian businessmen. France is far behind in education, but is keen to
expand student exchanges through an ambitious education plan, including
twinning of higher education institutions, mutual recognition of
degrees, exchange of doctoral students, along with an enabling agreement
on “people mobility and migration”.
Second, there is the advanced technology angle. France, unlike the
UK, is a privileged partner for cooperation in nuclear energy with
India. The agreement on the Jaitapur nuclear power project could not be
signed during Hollande’s visit but the commitment of both sides to its
early implementation “as soon as the commercial and technical
negotiations, which have made good progress, are completed” was
reiterated. India and the UK have now decided to open talks for a civil
nuclear cooperation agreement. In space, cooperation with France has
been longstanding and an agreement to launch a jointly developed
satellite was announced during Hollande’s visit, but this area is absent
from the gamut of India-UK ties. India concerns about easier access to
hi-technology were addressed by Hollande by the signature of several
memorandums of understanding between institutions to broaden the scope
and depth of future engagements in science, technology and innovation.
Cameron too stated UK’s commitment to make available to India the
cutting edge British technologies, civil and military, that the UK
currently shares with its top international partners, but in accordance
with “international obligations”. Cameron supports greater cooperation
betwen DRDO and the UK Defence Science and Technology Laboratory. Both
Hollande and Cameron supported India’s membership of the NSG. MTCR,
Australia Group and Wassenar Arrangement, the four non-proliferation and
technology control regimes.
Third, there is the defence angle. Both France and the UK have been
longstanding defence partners of India, but France has a record
untainted by participation in sanctions. Cameron has expressed his
disappointment publicly at losing the contract for the Medium Multi-role
Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) to France. During Hollande’s visit it was noted
that “the projects for the Scorpene submarine and upgrade of the Mirage
2000 are moving forward and steps are being taken for early
finalization of the Short Range Surface to air Missile project. Both
sides noted the progress of ongoing negotiations on the MMRCA programme
and look forward to their conclusion.” This should dampen speculation
that the Eurofighter might re-enter the fray if the negotiations with
Dassault run into difficulty. The Augusta-Westland controversy cast its
inevitable shadow on the Cameron visit.
Afghanistan, Iran and Syria figured in discussions, as well as
enhanced counter-terrorism and cyber-security cooperation. Both leaders
called for an expeditious trial of those responsible for the Mumbai
terrorist attacks. Both reiterated support for India’s United Nations
Security Council permanent membership.
The recent tendency in India to belittle the importance of Europe in
our external ties is ill-considered and ill-informed, suggesting a
discomforting hubris on the part of some of our opinion-makers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.