The Finance Minister, Mr. P Chidambaram has begun a major exercise to
rein in the burgeoning fiscal deficit which is likely to rise to 6
percent of GDP. The stated objective is to bring down the deficit to a
level of 5.3 percent of the GDP as many financial and economic experts
have recommended that maintaining a deficit of around 5 percent would be
a prudent step looking at the current state of economy. This would
prevent erosion of country’s fiscal credibility which has been somewhat
under attack by credit rating agencies. Though plans have been proposed
to reduce the government’s expenditure and obtaining funds from
disinvestment, sale of spectrum and other assets and asking for special
and enhanced dividends from Public Sector Enterprises, yet these
measures may not be adequate to restrict the fiscal deficit to the
targeted figure of around 5 percent.
In October, the Finance Ministry called for a reduction of non-plan
expenditure by 10 percent which in effect means that over all savings,
through this step, could amount to Rs. 75,000 crores. Though, it is not
clear as to whether reduction of defence expenditure is part of this
step yet, it is well known that generally the Ministry of Defence has
not been quite up to the mark when it comes to spending the allotted
funds especially from the capital account (meant for modernisation
programmes) in time.
At the time of presentation of defence budget for financial year
2011-12 in February, 2011 it was claimed that funds allotted have been
fully spent and this was as a result of a number of steps taken by the
Ministry of Defence (MOD) to fast track the procurement process.
However, while presenting the Revised Estimates (RE) for 2011-12, it
came to light that from Army’s capital budget an amount of Rs. 3055
crores had been surrendered; Navy was allowed to spend more than its
allotted budget by Rs. 2801 crores otherwise the amount of
under-spending would have been higher. Total surrender of funds by the
MOD which included those by the Air Force amounted to Rs. 5727 crores.
This only indicates that despite frequent revision of Defence
Procurement procedures the lingering problem of delays in acquisitions
has not been entirely solved and the expenditure inefficiencies persist.
The problems of defence modernisation are further compounded by what
is projected by the Services/MOD and what is finally allotted because of
the budgetary constraints. The tables given below indicate the
requirements projected and the funds allotted.
As can be observed from the above figures there is a complete
mismatch between what is projected and what is allotted. In fact, during
the entire plan period of Eleventh Five Year Defence Plan (2007-2012)
each of the services has got allocations that are less than the
projections during each of the year. Further, the committed liabilities
cannot be changed and therefore the axe falls on the capital budget for
new schemes. The problem is more acute in case of the Army where DGOF
Supplies has taken away large chunk of the capital modernisation budget
of 2012-13. All this has been questioned by the Parliament’s Standing
Committee for Defence (SCD); MOD representative in his reply obfuscated
the issue by a giving a stock reply that Ministry of Finance would be
approached for further funds. The SCD has expressed grave concern on the
meager outlay for the new programmes. The Committee has also stressed
that not only the committed liabilities should be taken care of but
additional allocations should also be made to cover the huge gaps
between the required and existing capabilities. There are deficiencies
in force levels, armaments, munitions, aircraft and so on.
With the MOF’s continuing its efforts in restricting the fiscal
deficit it might come about that defence budget for 2012-13 (Rs
193407.29 Crores) may be negatively impacted. Some estimates indicate
that the allocations may be reduced by upto five percent or an amount of
Rs. 5500 crores to about Rs. 10,000 crores. Since the scope for
reducing the revenue budget is limited the capital budget would become
target for major reductions. Further, it is the new schemes that will
suffer rather than the past contractual obligations.
The critical hollowness as brought out by the present and previous
Army Chiefs had moved the government to place orders for acquisition of
missiles and ammunition for tanks and infantry combat vehicles. The IAF
has also ordered for 200 Brahmos cruise missiles; apparently all such
acquisitions might have to be met through better accounting/management
between the revenue and capital account. But, the new programmes in the
capital account are likely to suffer thus putting paid the plans for
ushering in RMA at a faster pace in the Indian Armed Forces. As it is,
the proposal for raising a Mountain Strike Corps has been sent back to
the Chiefs of Staff Committee for a relook thus relieving the Finance
Ministry from making any allocations for the same if it were to be
raised in the current fiscal year. The Army’s plans for acquiring heavy
and medium vehicles, artillery guns, air defence systems, communications
equipment would also suffer a setback. The Army’s budget being over 50
percent of the defence budget is likely to be impacted the most. The Air
Force and Navy programmes would fare no better. If the economic
situation deteriorates further then there is a likelihood of large
committed liabilities of the technology intensive IAF and Indian Navy
being deferred which may again add to delays.
The economic growth has been showing a downward momentum and various
estimates indicate that this year the growth would be less than 6
percent of the GDP (somewhat closer to 5 percent). The Prime Minister,
addressing the Combined Commanders Conference some years back had
promised to enhance the defence budget to 3 percent of the GDP if Indian
economy continued to grow at 8 percent of the GDP. But that may not
come about for some time. For last two years the defence budget has been
less than 2 percent of the GDP which has prevented the acceleration of
modernisation of the armed forces. Further, in the coming elections
season the problems may be compounded by the need of the government to
divert funds for development sector or other programmes which would have
bearing on the forthcoming elections in 2014.
While there is a need for the armed forces to streamline its revenue
expenditure it also needs to rectify its expenditure inefficiencies for
which the MOD has been criticized many times. As underlined earlier,
though Defence Procurement Procedures have been modified several times
yet the same has not helped in removing the inefficiencies in
procurement. If the MOD is unable to spend 2/3rd of the funds by end
December then there is a great scope for reducing its allocations in the
Revised Estimates stage for the current fiscal. There are indications
that this level of expenditure may not be achieved by then.
Meanwhile, China and Pakistan have been adding to their arsenal and
have vastly improved their strategic posture at the borders. The SCD in
its report for 2012-2013 demands for grants has emphasised on ‘the
urgent need for to build the Defence capabilities to face any of the
challenges including the worst scenario of two front war. As such the
Committee strongly recommends that the requisite allocations should be
made available to the Ministry of Defence for their different
programmes. Besides, the Ministry of Defence on their part should also
build capacities to utilize the allocated resources.”
Thus, the modernisation programme of Indian Armed Forces needs to be
kept on track. The Finance Minister should be looking largely at the
other ministries and departments and other innovative ways to shore up
government’s finances as the military has been, for many years, allotted
funds which are much less than what is required.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.